[fpc-pascal] TurboVision is reborn as FOSS (again)
Sven Barth
pascaldragon at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 21 23:45:16 CET 2020
Travis Siegel via fpc-pascal <fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org> schrieb am
Mo., 21. Dez. 2020, 17:41:
> I don't know what non native english speakers are taught, nor can I
> address the folks across the pond, but here in the Us at least, has denotes
> currently exists, while had indicates past tense, I.E. no longer exists.
> Combining the two is where it gets dicy, and is generally avoided for
> syntactical reasons.
>
There is nothing dicy about combining them as "have" is just a normal verb
like anything else and thus can be used together with the "have/has/had"
temporal particle without any problems.
As long as one knows why a certain temporal construct is used there is no
problem and at least in Germany (or more specifically Bavaria) we were
taught that in masses.
Regards,
Sven
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20201221/c456da2d/attachment.htm>
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list