[fpc-pascal] Powtils: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or lightwebserver3?

silvioprog silvioprog at gmail.com
Tue Oct 29 15:03:11 CET 2013


2013/10/29 Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org>

> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys <graeme at geldenhuys.co.uk>
>>       On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
>>       So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
>>
>> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded
>> HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy,
>> tiWebServer, FPC, nYume etc). I must agree with Michael, fphttpserver is
>> a good choice. There is a bit of a learning
>> curve [compared to some others], but nothing major. Overall, I'm very
>> happy with the final choice on fphttpserver.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Graeme
>>
>>
>> Me too. I'm using fphttpserver in several other projects, and I'm very
>> happy.
>>
>> My new project needs of SSL securit, however, I'm still considering using
>> HTTP with another encryption instead of SSL.
>>
>
> https protocol support is on my TODO list. Should hopefully be implemented
> before christmas :)
>
> Michael.


Yyyeeesss, this is an excellent news Michael! :)

I'll use this future feature in Brook via broker, then I'll not need to
change the code in my projects.

-- 
Silvio Cl├ęcio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20131029/966a4177/attachment.html>


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list