[fpc-pascal] Powtils: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or lightwebserver3?

Michael Van Canneyt michael at freepascal.org
Tue Oct 29 14:36:15 CET 2013

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, silvioprog wrote:

> 2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys <graeme at geldenhuys.co.uk>       On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
>       So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy,
> tiWebServer, FPC, nYume etc). I must agree with Michael, fphttpserver is a good choice. There is a bit of a learning
> curve [compared to some others], but nothing major. Overall, I'm very happy with the final choice on fphttpserver.
> Regards,
>   Graeme
> Me too. I'm using fphttpserver in several other projects, and I'm very happy.
> My new project needs of SSL securit, however, I'm still considering using HTTP with another encryption instead of SSL.

https protocol support is on my TODO list. 
Should hopefully be implemented before christmas :)


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list