[fpc-pascal] Powtils: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or lightwebserver3?

silvioprog silvioprog at gmail.com
Tue Oct 29 13:04:29 CET 2013

2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys <graeme at geldenhuys.co.uk>

> On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
> So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded
> HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy, tiWebServer, FPC, nYume etc). I
> must agree with Michael, fphttpserver is a good choice. There is a bit of a
> learning curve [compared to some others], but nothing major. Overall, I'm
> very happy with the final choice on fphttpserver.
> Regards,
>   Graeme

Me too. I'm using fphttpserver in several other projects, and I'm very

My new project needs of SSL securit, however, I'm still considering using
HTTP with another encryption instead of SSL.

Silvio Cl├ęcio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20131029/dafbc32b/attachment.html>

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list