[fpc-pascal] Powtils: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or lightwebserver3?

silvioprog silvioprog at gmail.com
Tue Oct 29 13:04:29 CET 2013


2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys <graeme at geldenhuys.co.uk>

> On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
>
> So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
>
>
> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded
> HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy, tiWebServer, FPC, nYume etc). I
> must agree with Michael, fphttpserver is a good choice. There is a bit of a
> learning curve [compared to some others], but nothing major. Overall, I'm
> very happy with the final choice on fphttpserver.
>
> Regards,
>   Graeme
>

Me too. I'm using fphttpserver in several other projects, and I'm very
happy.

My new project needs of SSL securit, however, I'm still considering using
HTTP with another encryption instead of SSL.

-- 
Silvio Cl├ęcio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20131029/dafbc32b/attachment.html>


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list