[fpc-pascal] Re: RE : Re: RE : Re: RE : Re: RE : FPCUp FPC/Lazarus installer/updater: first Linux/Windows version released

Reinier Olislagers reinierolislagers at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 14:27:15 CET 2012


On 11-2-2012 14:19, Ludo Brands wrote:
>>> Regarding side by side installations, wouldn't it be better 
>> to store 
>>> the lazarus config in a subdir of the lazarus install? A fixed 
>>> directory makes side by side installation of lazarus very difficult.
>> You mean a --primary-config path underneath the lazarus 
>> application directory? Could be done in principle.
>>
>> Then again, current fpcup does not have a fixed 
>> primary-config-path, merely a default one.
> Unless I overlooked something, the primary-config-path is pretty hardcoded
> now (XdgConfigHome/lazarusdevsettings). Adding a parameter for
> primary-config-path would solve a lot.
Oops, yes, you're right; will do that.

> Lazarus config files are sometimes part of the problem when working with
> svn. Making an all clean start would preferably also mean removing the
> lazarus config files.
True, I think you just about persuaded me ;)

>> I realize storing fpcup config files (e.g. SVN urls, etc) in 
>> the lazarus and/or fpc svn dirs may not be desirable - if we 
>> follow that strategy.
> Why not create a fpcup script or link alongside the launcher(s) that take
> the same parameters as the one use to create the launcher? Something like
> 'lazlinkname' and 'lazlinkname Update'.     
Mmm, don't get what you mean here. What do you mean by launcher and the
parameters used to create the launcher?

Off working on making --primary-config-path configurable... and applying
your patch...



More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list