[fpc-pascal] More Win CE
fantomaspda at yandex.com
Sat Nov 20 14:48:48 CET 2010
>> Then, it is awesome, is not it? As for me, WM and its API was quite
>> comprehensible and convenient to develope applications in my favourite
>> Pascal. There was large number of devices running under WM. Fotunately, there
>> is a lot of ones so far.
> Sorry, but what do think is awesome? That you can only write .NET
> applications for Windows Phone 7? That's what I call terrible (which is
> basically the contrary of "awesome").
Of course, I meant that it's terrible and horrible, for I like WM and
>> Maybe in the near future it will be worth to tend to the upcoming Bada platform
>> of Samsung which allows to develope in C++? :)
> Operating systems which provide a C++ API are always harder to interface
> with e.g. Free Pascal than C based ones, because you need to flatten the
> interface. See e.g. QT where you need to use an additional library which
> flattens the C++ based API to a C based one.
I still do not know much of the bada architecture, but I am not really sure that
bada support is easy to add to FPC (if you are speaking of the bada port). I
only meant that I can use bada IDE to code in C/C++. I am not very fond of Java
More information about the fpc-pascal