[fpc-devel] Attn Michael: r 43417 (ordinal bithelpers)

[Sven Barth]

Florian Klämpfl <florian at freepascal.org> schrieb am Sa., 9. Nov. 2019,
20:45:

> Am 09.11.19 um 20:26 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> >
> >> Am 09.11.19 um 20:02 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> What matters is we have the tests.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes. But I see no point in having the rtl tests cluttered to
> >>>> different locations.
> >>>
> >>> Exactly.
> >>>
> >>> My solution is WAY superior to yours in this respect.
> >>>
> >>> I have exactly 1 application which I open in lazarus. I can navigate
> >>> between all the 100ds of tests without problem.
> >>>
> >>> Compile, run, ready. It's a matter of seconds.
> >>
> >> Yes, if you ignore that you need to handle different compilers/targets
> >> (installed/trunk/fixes/cross compilers/remote testing).
> >
> > I would ignore this in each case. I compile & test for the platform I
> > work on.
> >
> > The rest would be for the daily testsuite run. That is why it exists.
>
> This is way too late. This would result in a continuously broken
> compiler/rtl.
>

But if they're used for the daily run they'd also be used for the ones run
manually? I mean I did of after all for the Rtti unit tests as well...

Regards,
Sven

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20191109/3002d4a3/attachment.html>