[fpc-devel] what fpc is good for?
daniel.mantione at freepascal.org
Sun May 13 23:00:31 CEST 2007
Op Sun, 13 May 2007, schreef Peter Popov:
> > Yes. The problem in this case is clear. Automated is deprecated andrarely
> > used functionality. (like e.g. dynamic methods).
> Let me know if I can help in any way with automation RTTI compatibility? If
> this feature is implemented (just the RTTI, nothing further) I can release a
> small unit which implements remote method/properties calls over a TCP
> connection. Not exactly corba, but still useful.
Can take a look at the ncgrtti unit in the compiler source code and see if
you understand it? This RTTI generation would need to be added here,
generating RTTI itself is easy, but you need to know what to generate.
More information about the fpc-devel