[fpc-pascal] FPDoc - how to document overloaded functions?

[Michael Van Canneyt]

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

> On 2017-07-12 15:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> You can't. There are no provisions for this.
>> 
>> I usually make the differences clear in the <descr> </descr> node.
>
>
> Thanks Michael. I've been playing around with fpdoc and trying a few things 
> and then reviewing the results. Attached is the output I have thus far for 
> ovorloaded functions.
>
> NOTE:
>  In generates multiple "Arguments" sections, and they seem to appear
>  in the same order as what they are in the "Declaration" section.
>  I only documented each parameter once in the XML, and fpdoc
>  duplicated it to match the Declaration section.
>
>  It kind of works, but there is definitely place for improvement in
>  the HTML output (layout of information).
>
>
> ps #1:
>  I haven't tried documenting function results yet, so not sure what FPDOC is 
> going to do with that in this output.
>
>
> ps #2:
>  Also not the "Errors" section. There I simply used the <p> tags to document 
> both possible error results. I couldn't see any other way of doing it.

I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to achieve ?

Michael.