[fpc-pascal] Smart Pointers

[Maciej Izak]

2016-05-11 14:23 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org>:

> Where is that written ?  As far as I know, it is only there because classes
> is there, and classes has some define to allow it to be compiled with fgl.
>
>
by Sven (29 January 2016 10:54 thread "Generics.Collections as package for
Lazarus or package for FPC RTL"):

"also fgl is a nice test durog cycling the compiler that nothing basic was
broken with generics; one of the main reason it's still in rtl and not
rtl-objpas or rtl-extra"

 keeping module in RTL just to have nice test to check compiler cycle is
... very very very strange.


> There should not be double standards.
> If the consequence is that the fgl unit should move as well: No problem
> with that.


If we will keep right order then I have no problem with Generics.* as
rtl-generics package, and I can realize my plans with compiler in other,
more correct way.

-- 
Best regards,
Maciej Izak
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20160511/6b8a964a/attachment.html>