[fpc-pascal] Counting semaphore for free pascal
mschnell at lumino.de
Wed Jul 29 17:05:03 CEST 2015
On 07/29/2015 04:47 PM, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
> I see you're using two concepts of synchronization (semaphore and
> events) at the same time.
> Maybe better to separate them?
> It is not clear why use events to limit thread access to service.
There are several implementation details a semaphore can have
- counting / not counting
- if taken by a precess/thread will the same process/thread
block/count when it tries a second take ?
- if taken by a precess/thread is a different process/thread allowed
to free it ?
More information about the fpc-pascal