[fpc-pascal] Lack of 'volatile' a serious issue. Any other such caveats?
pascaldragon at googlemail.com
Sat Dec 19 14:24:03 CET 2015
Am 19.12.2015 14:19 schrieb "Jonas Maebe" <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be>:
> On 18/12/15 10:12, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>> I know FreePascal is not Linux, the Team is not Torvalds etc;)
>> but have you seen this ?
> Maybe a "volatile" intrinsic, just like we already have an "unaligned"
intrinsic, would indeed be a better idea than adding the possibility to
mark data as volatile. As an extra plus, it would map directly onto LLVM :)
(which also only supports "volatile" as an attribute for load/store
I've had the same thought when I read the article. :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the fpc-pascal