[fpc-pascal] Benchmarks are odious, but...

leledumbo leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id
Wed Dec 24 05:06:32 CET 2014

> Allowing that he used FPC 2.2.0, is optimisation etc. likely to have 
improved enough that somebody could usefully suggest he rerun the test? 

Upgrading his tools would be better, they're waaaaaaay to old. However, for
FPC, I'd like to see when the next stable release comes out. There are new
optimizations that could give noticable improvement.

View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Benchmarks-are-odious-but-tp5720669p5720670.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list