[fpc-pascal] Benchmarks are odious, but...

[Mark Morgan Lloyd]

At http://www.fourmilab.ch/fbench/fbench.html John Walker, formerly of 
Autodesk, rates FPC as one of the faster languages but remarks "To the 
best of my knowledge, none of the language implementations tested 
exploit the thread-level parallelism implemented in modern processors."

Allowing that he used FPC 2.2.0, is optimisation etc. likely to have 
improved enough that somebody could usefully suggest he rerun the test?

-- 
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]