[fpc-pascal] Namespaces Support

[Fabrício Srdic]

2013/10/26 Dmitry Boyarintsev <skalogryz.lists at gmail.com>

> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Fabrício Srdic <fabricio.srdic at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree with the importance of backward compatibility, but I disagree
>> when it becomes a reason to stop the implementation of improvements in the
>> tool.
>>
>
> Well, no. You shouldn't say "improvement". Because "improvement" has
> positive context, already.
> Instead, you should use the word "change" which is more neutral.
>
> So let me paraphrase you: "I agree with the importance of backward
> compatibility, but I disagree when it becomes a reason to stop the
> implementation of changes in the tool."
> Doesn't sounds so bright, right? Because it's unknown if a change is good,
> if it helps or if it is beneficial.
>

If the namespace feature isn't a improvement, so why was it added to fpc?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20131026/45f585f2/attachment.html>