[fpc-pascal] Powtils: lightwebserver, lightwebserver2 or lightwebserver3?

[silvioprog]

2013/11/1 Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org>

> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Juha Manninen wrote:
>
>  On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
>> <graeme at geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded
>>> HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy, tiWebServer, FPC, nYume
>>> etc). I
>>> must agree with Michael, fphttpserver is a good choice. There is a bit
>>> of a
>>> learning curve [compared to some others], but nothing major. Overall, I'm
>>> very happy with the final choice on fphttpserver.
>>>
>>
>> Out of curiosity, how is its performance compared to Indy based web
>> server.
>>
>
> fphttpserver was not built for speed. I would not dare to make this
> comparison.

[...]

Once I did a test and fphttpserver responded to 2000 requests per second. ;)

-- 
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20131101/890488ee/attachment.html>