[fpc-pascal] Win64 release of FPC 2.6.2 missing
atbrunner at aurawin.com
Mon May 6 21:15:03 CEST 2013
I agree with what you are saying as long as the os matches the binary type. An x64 native package must install a x64bit binary and utils.
I would be understating if I said that a 32bit binary would be normal on a 64bit distro.
A safe new way to store and share your files, pictures, videos and more.
On May 6, 2013, at 2:32 AM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be> wrote:
> On 04 May 2013, at 16:24, Andrew Brunner wrote:
>> I agree that most of us first go to x64 downloads for binaries. Thinking 32 to 64 or reverse is onerous on typical end users.
> The whole point is that the "typical end user" doesn't know nor should have to care about whether the compiler is a 32 or 64 bit binary. It should not make any difference whatsoever. If it does, then that's either a bug in FPC, or in Lazarus, its fpmake files or Makefiles (or fpcmake).
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
More information about the fpc-pascal