[fpc-pascal] HMAC_SHA1 and FPC

silvioprog silvioprog at gmail.com
Tue Mar 26 16:14:43 CET 2013


2013/3/26 Sven Barth <pascaldragon at googlemail.com>

>  Am 26.03.2013 06:53, schrieb Anthony Walter:
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:20 AM, silvioprog <silvioprog at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   I don't know if you noticed, but I sent the ALL test cases required by
>> the RFC 2202 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2202), i.e., it's enough to
>> check whether the algorithm it's well implemented or not.
>>
>>  I'll await the answer of the staff of Core, because for me the final
>> answer is theirs.
>>
>>  --
>> Silvio Clécio
>> My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
>> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>>
>
> I wasn't asking you to stop your work, rather I was attempting to share
> insights and my opinions with the group. My point in the previous message
> was that many times it make sense to reuse something which works, and
> possibly part of the operating system, rather than recreating that which
> already exists.
>
> We already have a "hash" package and I'm all for improving/extending it.
> This can prove especially useful for platforms where OpenSSL is not
> supported (think the embedded targets or similar here). Also I'm a big fan
> of "as less non-Pascal dependencies as possible" :)
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>

+1.

And I'm sure the hmac is fast as anything else out there who write, even
using libs maked in C/C+. :)

-- 
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/attachments/20130326/330f2330/attachment.html>


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list