<div dir="ltr">2013/3/26 Sven Barth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pascaldragon@googlemail.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>Am 26.03.2013 06:53, schrieb Anthony
Walter:<br>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<blockquote type="cite">On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:20 AM, silvioprog <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:silvioprog@gmail.com" target="_blank">silvioprog@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_extra">I don't know if you noticed,
but I sent the ALL test cases required by the RFC 2202
(<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2202" target="_blank">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2202</a>),
i.e., it's enough to check whether the algorithm it's
well implemented or not.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">I'll await the answer of the
staff of Core, because for me the final answer is
theirs.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div><br>
</div>
--<br>
Silvio Clécio<br>
My public projects - <a href="http://github.com/silvioprog" target="_blank">github.com/silvioprog</a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
fpc-pascal maillist - <a href="mailto:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org" target="_blank">fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal" target="_blank">http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<div>I wasn't asking you to stop your work, rather I was
attempting to share insights and my opinions with the group. My
point in the previous message was that many times it make sense
to reuse something which works, and possibly part of the
operating system, rather than recreating that which already
exists.<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div>
We already have a "hash" package and I'm all for improving/extending
it. This can prove especially useful for platforms where OpenSSL is
not supported (think the embedded targets or similar here). Also I'm
a big fan of "as less non-Pascal dependencies as possible" :)<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sven</div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>+1.</div><div><br></div><div>And I'm sure the hmac is fast as anything else out there who write, even using libs maked in C/C+. :)<br></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Silvio Clécio<br>
My public projects - <a href="http://github.com/silvioprog" target="_blank">github.com/silvioprog</a>
</div></div>