[fpc-pascal] Re: fpc registry unit

leledumbo leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id
Sat Mar 2 03:05:17 CET 2013


> Registry is not part of rtl because it's not a base unit??? This is my
point it uses 200 other f*** units that aren't really needed!

YOU don't use those 200 units, but the UNIT YOU USE needs them. Get the
point?
Even though you don't, what about other people? FPC is not released just for
you, dude. Stop being selfish...

> So you are saying if one wants a single 50 line unit & does a complex
> procedure eg installi ng 10^10 lines of fpc etc then it is simple?  And of
> course you have to do this for every version of fpc you want to use! 

Simple, just grab the installer (win or mac), or take from repository (lin),
or compile from source (all).
You don't seem to understand the basic concept how modular programming
(unit) works, and FPC packages is highly modular. We won't include
everything in a single unit, that's SILLY.

> And, of course as I've seen, the size of the .exe from  v2.2.2 cf v2.6.2
> is twice as large because of all the c*** included by the various uses..

Not really, code size increase can come from anything. Feature support,
unstripped binaries, change in debug info format, etc. but so what? How big
is that anyway? Twice? You must be kidding, if you do everything properly,
the size increase won't even touch 20%. I have an application that I've
developed since 2008 (https://code.google.com/p/express-gui) and you can see
the "increase" in size of the binaries from time to time (search All
Downloads to see everything since 2008). Increase? Yeah if you count
backwards...

> This is all simple?  Not in my dictionary's definition! Dooooooh 

Then expand it, your dictionary is too localized and narrow



--
View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/fpc-registry-unit-tp5713265p5713290.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list