[fpc-pascal] Re: 2.6.0 for Solaris?
ludo.brands at free.fr
Wed May 9 21:05:56 CEST 2012
> Your question, as given unambiguously in the subject line, relates to
> 2.6.0. I'm telling you, equally unambiguously, that you don't
> want to do
> that. You might need to start off with an older binary to get
> going, or you might be able to get hold of a binary for 2.6.0, but
> having done that, in the case of SPARC, you want to get onto 2.7.1
> rather than relying on 2.6.0's correctness.
> > I have no particular need for 2.6.0, I just normally try to get the
> > stable release of whatever new thing I decide to try out and I
> > understood from the website 2.6.0 is the one I should use.
> You are, of course, free to ignore my advice.
In any case, 2.6.0 is needed now to build 2.7.1. Just rebuild 2.7.1 from
today on Solaris 10 Intel and it failed miserably with 2.4.4. That worked a
few months ago and the 2.7.1 then build doesn't build todays 2.7.1 neither.
Only 2.6.0 builds 2.7.1 correctly.
But I fully agree: don't do more on Solaris with 2.6.0 than building 2.7.1.
More information about the fpc-pascal