[fpc-pascal] Re: TLinkedList
michael.vancanneyt at wisa.be
michael.vancanneyt at wisa.be
Wed Feb 15 15:09:45 CET 2012
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 15.02.2012 14:09, schrieb michael.vancanneyt at wisa.be:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>>> Am 14.02.2012 22:28, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
>>>> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
>>>>>> Afaik it was the main reason to implement generic constraints in
>>>>>> Delphi (like
>>>>>> .NET)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Constraints allow the compiler to infer further information on the
>>>>> given
>>>>> types to improve e.g. type checking when parsing the generic,
>>>>
>>>> Exactly. You e.g. know that the unspecialized generic is already
>>>> meant for
>>>> reference types, from line one.
>>>>
>>>>> but they won't magically allow the compiler to not duplicate code (in
>>>>> theory it would be possible to do something like Java's generics for
>>>>> cases
>>>>> where the constraints are for descendants of TObject or IInterface,
>>>>> but in
>>>>> my opinion the tradeoffs (increased compiler complexity) are not worth
>>>>> it).
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, that is typical. If it is not used inside the compiler it is
>>>> unoptimized :-)
>>>>
>>>> Maybe redo cclasses with generics?
>>>
>>> That wouldn't change that much... the performance of specialized
>>> generics isn't that different from "normal" code.
>>
>> I tested that. It's about 10% slower.
>
> Compile time or runtime?
Runtime.
Michael.
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list