jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Tue Jan 27 10:36:27 CET 2009
On 27 Jan 2009, at 11:30, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> Zitat von Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be>:
>> I've used qprof successfully in the past (not for FPC programs, but
>> for other things). It's a sampling-based profiler, so it shouldn't
>> slow down things too much.
> Yes, that's why I prefer gprof and used it a lot in the past.
Note that I was talking about qprof (http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/qprof/
), not gprof. As opposed to qprof (and Shark on Mac OS X), gprof is
not a sampling-based profiler (gprof traces the entire execution).
More information about the fpc-pascal