[fpc-pascal] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPCcodebase
tpelton at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 16:07:32 CET 2007
On Nov 21, 2007 7:07 AM, Skybuck Flying <skybuck2000 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > But it's not open source.
> I like to think of open source vs closed source as: Viewable / Non-Viewable.
... and _that_ is where you are going wrong.
"open source" is a licensing term in these contexts.
By making source code viewable does not grant one a license to copy
it, in the same way that you can't photo copy and distribute a book.
An amazing number of people seem to be highly confused by this.
This is probably why projects like FreePascal get sideswiped by
tainted code on a too frequent basis.
X-SA user ? 0.5.1 is out !
XData 0.1 for X-SA is out !
More information about the fpc-pascal