[fpc-pascal] Documentation for sqldb - More Questions

Joost van der Sluis joost at cnoc.nl
Tue Jul 3 13:16:04 CEST 2007

On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 12:57 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> I'd rather see that the whole is coordinated a bit. I don't think all
> this
> duplication is a good idea; One solid set of components makes much
> more
> sense: the number of developers available for it's maintenance would
> double. 
> The end user would also benefit, as we can give 1 solid set of
> components,
> no doubts possible.

I aggree with Michael on this. Besides, last time I looked at your
'TBufDataset' (which is a actually a fork, offcourse) it only
implemented blob-fields, on top of the existing TBufDataset.

The current TBufDataset also supports blob-fields, in a (in my opinion)
better way, now. Are there any other changes/additions?


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list