[fpc-pascal] Object pascal a "Modern Language"

Matt Henley nwmatt at gmail.com
Fri Mar 3 20:56:27 CET 2006


Thanks for all the replies, i will try to formulate an agrigate response.

On 3/3/06, Rodrigo Palhano <rodrigo at speedcase.com.br> wrote:
> but not losing the focus, Pascal is a very modern language.
>
> On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:29:21 -0300, Micha Nelissen <micha at neli.hopto.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:14:41 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
> > Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > That's simply not true. C++ has multiple inheritance,
> >>
> >> Solved by interfaces in a much cleaner way.
> >
> > That doesn't solve the same problem. MI is much more powerful, but also
> > much more complex, and easily abused so that code maintainability goes
> > *down* instead of up.
> >
> >> > templates,
> >>
> >> Agreed, but absolutely not essential. It just saves typing.
> >
> > That's an opinion, not a fact ;-).
> >
> >> > classes in shared libraries
> >>
> >> So does FPC if you so desire ? The RTL can be compiled as a shared lib,
> >> and that includes Classes...
> >
> > This is *very* recent stuff. Is it in 2.0.x yet? Does lazarus work
> > properly
> > with a shared LCL library ?
> >
> > Micha
> > _______________________________________________
> > fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
> > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rodrigo Palhano
> ---------------------------------
> Equipe SpeedCASE
>
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>



More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list