[fpc-pascal] Common OpenMP syntax?

Vincent Snijders vsnijders at quicknet.nl
Wed Jul 26 11:34:15 CEST 2006

Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
>> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
>>> Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
>>>> Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from being
>>>> complete yet (it just covers a basic "parallel" construct), nor is
>>>> it really thought through yet, but well, it might be a start;
>>>> something to begin with.
>>>> Any suggestions are welcome, of course.
>>> Does parallel mean all the statements in the block can be executed in
>>> parallel, or that multiple copies of the block of statements can be
>>> started in parallel ?
>> The latter.
> Which is why I think that it's better to have them as local functions,
> instead of having to introduce a lot of new functions.
> Local functions are very pascal-ish. C doesn't have it, which is why they can't use it.
> Let's use the language features to their full extent.

I added an example with nested procedures.


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list