[fpc-pascal] Common OpenMP syntax?

Michael Van Canneyt michael at freepascal.org
Wed Jul 26 11:00:47 CEST 2006

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:

> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> > Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> > > Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from being
> > > complete yet (it just covers a basic "parallel" construct), nor is
> > > it really thought through yet, but well, it might be a start;
> > > something to begin with.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions are welcome, of course.
> >
> > Does parallel mean all the statements in the block can be executed in
> > parallel, or that multiple copies of the block of statements can be
> > started in parallel ?
> The latter.

Which is why I think that it's better to have them as local functions,
instead of having to introduce a lot of new functions.

Local functions are very pascal-ish. C doesn't have it, which is why they can't use it.
Let's use the language features to their full extent.


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list