[fpc-pascal] Semaphore problems

[Micha Nelissen]

Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 06:40, Micha Nelissen wrote:
>> Vinzent Höfler wrote:
>>> because we assume it's non-recursive, that was the whole point. So
>>> we should *first* check the count and then may lock/unlock the
>>> mutex accordingly.
>> Note that these two actions must be atomic.
> 
> Oh, really?

Ehm, no. Got confused a bit :-). Reread the thread, and think your
latest implementation as posted here is ok.

Micha