[fpc-pascal] Semaphore problems
micha at neli.hopto.org
Tue Jul 25 09:46:24 CEST 2006
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 06:40, Micha Nelissen wrote:
>> Vinzent Höfler wrote:
>>> because we assume it's non-recursive, that was the whole point. So
>>> we should *first* check the count and then may lock/unlock the
>>> mutex accordingly.
>> Note that these two actions must be atomic.
> Oh, really?
Ehm, no. Got confused a bit :-). Reread the thread, and think your
latest implementation as posted here is ok.
More information about the fpc-pascal