[fpc-pascal] Sharp Zaurus ARM port stability?
alain.vitry at gmail.com
Fri Jul 22 09:32:51 CEST 2005
Thank you Den.
I'll do some homework and keep you posted of my findings and progress.
Don't expect much progress in the next 3 weeks, I'm on holiday :)
Le 22 juil. 05, à 00:24, Den Jean a écrit :
> On Thursday 21 July 2005 06:53 pm, Alain Vitry wrote:
>> Could you point me to some reading/starting point on how to make those
>> bindings ?
>> Swig doesn't support pascal yet.
>> I have a fresh QT4 bindings for pascal in mind.
> There are several ways:
> kalyptus: see cvs/fpc/utils/kalyptus
> google on kde bindings / qt bindings
> Florian started from the c-kalyptus one.
> smoke: more for scripting languages
> smoke/refract: c++ headers to xml using the gcc parsing capability.
> C++ may look to be the perfect parser for c++,
> but qt is not c++ but an enhanced
> delphi like language (hence why the moc)
> so distance to qt language is big.
> freeclx: based on moc parsing. Moc converts qt language to c++.
> So Moc is close to the qt language and it gives
> you a very able parser.
> With some modifications to the lex/yacc you can
> let moc produce a pascal qt binding.
> But each time trolltech adds to the qt language,
> they renew the moc,
> then you need to port your adaptations to the moc
> lex/yacc again.
> We adapted the qt part of freeclx from qt 2.2.4 to qt 2.3.2 and
> The result is on
> qtc binding: as pascal can easily use c-libraries, the qtc binding
> seems a good base
> but difficult to maintain at each update
> of the qtc binding.
> Andreas Hausladen is very productive in
> this matter. (allready qt3 binding),
> I guess qt4 is in the make. Perhaps you
> can join forces with him.
> kind regards,
> Den Jean
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
More information about the fpc-pascal