[fpc-pascal] First Test of FastMM4 for fpc

Jonas Maebe jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Mon Dec 19 11:35:43 CET 2005


On 19 dec 2005, at 10:47, Adrian Veith wrote:

> Test1 isn't relevant anymore. And in Test2 and Test3 fpc beats  
> delphi clearly. The benefits for the FastMM4 are now not that big  
> anymore, but it helps to compare delphi and fpc on a fair base,  
> since the impact of the MM is now leveled out.

But currently all these optimization have come at the cost of various  
new bugs in the ansistring handling (and possibly also in the heap  
manager), so don't use the current 2.1.1 for production work at this  
time. According to someone else's tests, svn revision 1948 is safe  
revision 1966 and onwards isn't (I don't think he tested 1949-1965,  
but 1949 is the one with the first optimizations).


Jonas



More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list