[fpc-pascal]Synapse for FPC

[Marco van de Voort]

> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > > implementation can be dynamically loaded.
> >
> > Why would an alternate implementation be unloadable just because the built-in
> > default one uses a few units?
> 
> I was of course just referring to your last point: i.e. the use of
> structures/calls from generic units as Winsock/Linux/Unix was explicitly
> avoided.

So was I. I just don't see why :-)

This is a mess. It might not even work on linux/ppc, let alone other
unices.

Anyway, I saw that synapse needs FCL units that are win32/linux only like
syncobj, so it is all a moot point.