[fpc-devel] I've asked this before, but perhaps I wasn't specific enough that time: what do I personally, specifically need to do to ensure that a native Windows 64-bit build winds up on the FPC website for the next release?

Thu Jan 13 00:00:06 CET 2022

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 23:20:34 +0100
> Sven Barth via fpc-devel <fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
>
>> [..]
>> When compiling from a target supporting Extended to one only
>> supporting Double there isn't a loss of precision when calculating
>> values at compile time. The other way around however, there *is* and
>> that is the more crucial problem.
>
> I'm curious, do other cross compilers like gcc
> have similar problems? How do they solve it?

Does C have an extended type ? I thought they had only single and double ?

Michael.

[fpc-devel] I've asked this before, but perhaps I wasn't specific enough that time: what do I *personally*, specifically need to do to ensure that a native Windows 64-bit build winds up on the FPC website for the next release?

[fpc-devel] I've asked this before, but perhaps I wasn't specific enough that time: what do I personally, specifically need to do to ensure that a native Windows 64-bit build winds up on the FPC website for the next release?