[fpc-devel] Fixed up !104

[J. Gareth Moreton]

If needs be, I can easily build on this merge request later to fill the 
saved register arrays if a particular architecture has a tailor-made 
solution.

Note that the volatile registers are not saved in this array and are 
checked separately. (e.g. in aoptx86.pas, the method 
GetIntRegisterBetween, which could theoretically be made 
platform-independent (it contains some conditional code for i386 because 
8-bit registers can only be AL, CL, DL and BL), calls "RegSet 
:=paramanager.get_volatile_registers_int(current_procinfo.procdef.proccalloption) 
+current_procinfo.saved_regs_int;" to get the list of registers 
available to the current procedure.  While this is slightly slower, I 
figure it's a bit more flexible and backward-compatible.

Gareth aka. Kit

On 27/12/2021 19:32, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
> Hi Florian et al,
>
> I fixed up the CPU subtype in 
> https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/merge_requests/104 - 
> hopefully the merge request is good now.
>
> Gareth aka. Kit
>
>

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20211228/bdf2fc40/attachment.htm>