[fpc-devel] Sorry for poor testing
J. Gareth Moreton
gareth at moreton-family.com
Mon Jan 14 19:01:51 CET 2019
Aah cool. Thanks for that tip. Hmmm... I see "riot" in the flags... I
think it's going to be a riot with the errors found!
Gareth aka. Kit
On Mon 14/01/19 18:17 , Pierre Muller pierre at freepascal.org sent:
Hi all,
Le 14/01/2019 à 15:01, J. Gareth Moreton a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I apologise I didn't properly test my case block improvements,
especially where optimising for size is concerned. As someone who has
worked in SQA, I should have known better.
>
> I've also spotted a potential overflow condition (in some situations,
max_dist can become negative) - this is thankfully disguised, but I would
like to properly trap it and handle it cleanly and safely.
You should try to add
-CriotR to OPT when cycliing the compiler,
as it might find the overfows for you...
and even also do
make fullcycle OPT="-n -CriotR -gl"
as testing the change for 16 bit address
CPU can also reveal more range checking/overflow exceptions.
Pierre
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org [1]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[2]">http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Links:
------
[1] mailto:fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
[2] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20190114/793937ca/attachment.html>
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list