[fpc-devel] x86_64 Optimizer Overhaul
Martok
listbox at martoks-place.de
Sat Dec 15 20:37:22 CET 2018
Sorry for hijacking the thread. Your mail client issue makes the conversation
really hard to follow, so I have literally no idea what the current subtopic of
a reply chain is, and there's little point in properly detaching a thread.
Am 15.12.2018 um 18:13 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
> I dare ask, does that mean we should avoid workarounds in the compiler (and
> our own programs) that aim to avoid constant construction and destruction of
> objects, and instead try to improve the memory manager?
I was thinking more along the lines of avoiding cycle-counting special paths at
the cost of reliability, when there are much larger issues that would benefit
every program.
I would not be surprised if some of the large difference Simon listed when
calling out the bounty come from this side, instead of raw instruction throughput.
> Thus, I would imagine that Delphi's *default* internal memory management
> system is more along the lines of what is done in FPC's cmem unit, which is
> well known to be objectively faster than FPC's default memory manager
I'm fairly certain the runtime is written in Pascal, except for parts of the
startup code. The memory manager at some point (I think D2006?) adopted FastMM:
<http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/2010/en/Configuring_the_Memory_Manager>
In any case, FPC's cmem on Win32 calls into mscvrt, and that is so slow that I
killed the test code after a couple of minutes, where even FPC-builtin was done
after 10 seconds.
--
Regards,
Martok
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list