[fpc-devel] Discussion about "Dynamic packages"

Sven Barth pascaldragon at googlemail.com
Fri Apr 14 09:21:53 CEST 2017

Am 13.04.2017 23:54 schrieb "gabor" <gabor at poczta.onet.pl>:
> W dniu 2017-04-13 o 22:27, Sven Barth via fpc-devel pisze:
>> And it's not about saving RAM or disk memory! It's about *binary code
>> reuse*, the ability to fix a bug in multiple executables by merely
>> fixing the one bug in a package.
> Should not all packages depend on the "fixed" package also be recompiled
in this case?

As long as the fix is only in the implementation then you don't (except for
inline routines).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20170414/6f22a80a/attachment.html>

More information about the fpc-devel mailing list