[fpc-devel] Future of FPCUP tool

Tomas Hajny XHajT03 at hajny.biz
Sat Feb 21 18:04:07 CET 2015

On Sat, February 21, 2015 17:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Sat, February 21, 2015 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>>> Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
>>>>> In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
>>>>>> rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not
>>>>>> be ignored.
>>>>>> Should it be under FPC sources? If there is a motivated maintainer
>>>>>> from outside, can he get commit access for it?
>>>>> My suggestion was to put it in fpcbuild, iirc Florian hasn't reacted
>>>>> to
>>>>> that.
>>>> Hmmm, I thought I did. At least I think for now that we should keep it
>>>> separate and see how things evolve. fpcbuild is for now a too strong
>>>> commitment imo.
>>> Indeed. As I proposed: a separate SVN repo is not a problem.
>> May I remind fpcprojects again? ;-)
> You may, but the disadvantage is:
> a) the revision is shared between projects.
> b) user rights management is a trifle more difficult.

Alright, understood.


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list