[fpc-devel] Future of FPCUP tool

[Michael Van Canneyt]

On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Tomas Hajny wrote:

> On Sat, February 21, 2015 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>> Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
>>>> In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
>>>>> rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not
>>>>> be ignored.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should it be under FPC sources? If there is a motivated maintainer
>>>>> from outside, can he get commit access for it?
>>>>
>>>> My suggestion was to put it in fpcbuild, iirc Florian hasn't reacted to
>>>> that.
>>>
>>> Hmmm, I thought I did. At least I think for now that we should keep it
>>> separate and see how things evolve. fpcbuild is for now a too strong
>>> commitment imo.
>>
>> Indeed. As I proposed: a separate SVN repo is not a problem.
>
> May I remind fpcprojects again? ;-)

You may, but the disadvantage is:
a) the revision is shared between projects.
b) user rights management is a trifle more difficult.

Michael.