[fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
Boian Mitov
mitov at mitov.com
Tue Feb 19 22:28:37 CET 2013
Hi Sven,
Thank you!
I actually find "anonymous method" more verbose than "lambda" in a sentence
:-D .
Then the FPC is really way behind almost any other language :-( . Even C++
added native anonymous methods in C++11, and other languages have had them
for many years :-( .
I can't even imagine my development without them in Delphi any more, I mean
they really revolutionized my code, and allowed me to do things I have never
imagined before. Together with Attributes, and the new RTTI this is the
biggest revolution in Delphi, and transforms it into totally different
language. Now I can get something done with 4-5 lines of code which
otherwise would have required hundreds of lines and declaration of a whole
bunch of additional support classes and code. I mean this is a whole new
ballgame altogether! It is even bigger than the Object Oriented programming
was when it was introduced!
With best regards,
Boian Mitov
-------------------------------------------------------
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
-------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Sven Barth
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:18 PM
To: fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
On 19.02.2013 18:05, Boian Mitov wrote:
No, FPC does currently not support anonymous functions (please don't
call them Lambdas... at least not with that verbose syntax ;) ). We have
a branch where an independant developer started to work on them, but
development there has stalled.
What you might have seen recently on this list was a discussion about a
potential improvement of the syntax (less verbose for simpler cases).
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list