[fpc-devel] BBB / PRUS / M3 and fpc
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl.fpc-devel at telemetry.co.uk
Tue Dec 3 21:26:00 CET 2013
Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 02:34 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>> and that the memory provision is fairly meager, it might be more
>> trouble than it's worth.
>
> The Propeller is so short on closely coupled RAM that even to be able to
> use a decent C compiler, someone implemented a "virtual CPU" interpreter
> (i.e. "ZPU" architecture) to be run by the propeller core and create
> code for this architecture by a gnu c compiler that is provided by same.
>
> So in fact it seems a lot more appropriate to port fpc to ZPU than to
> the native propeller core.
>
>
> ZPU is a "zero register" 32 bit CPU architecture (it only has an up to
> 32 bit PC and an up to 32 Bit SP - less with memory space below 4 GB).
> Each instruction word is 8 bit wide. It is originally designed to be
> implemented in an FPGA, bus it also is excellent suited as a target for
> an interpreter.
>
> The ZPU architecture description and the C compiler can be obtained
> here: http://opensource.zylin.com/zpu.htm
>
> Infos on ZPU, including the Propeller virtual machine can be found t´in
> the mailing list zylin-zpu at zylin.com
Hmm. What with ZPU, LLVM, asm.js, Java bytecode, .NET CLI and no doubt
others, what's needed is some universally-agreed meta-VM or at least a
meta-representation. Tree-Meta, anybody?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list