[fpc-devel] FreeNotification and opRemove
    Hans-Peter Diettrich 
    DrDiettrich1 at aol.com
       
    Fri Mar  9 11:28:44 CET 2012
    
    
  
Martin schrieb:
> When C2 gets the opREmove, it must mot just remove it's own entry, but 
> also remove the entry C1 has
The meaning of opRemove is unclear. IMO it doesn't make sense in the 
example code, because the owner of a component can change many times, 
without meaning that the component is being destroyed. In such a 
scenario the receiver can not know whether (when) the notification 
should be removed, the notification itself is quite useless.
>>>>   Owner.RemoveComponent(C1); // C2 Gets on opRemove
DoDi
    
    
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list