[fpc-devel] FreeNotification and opRemove
Hans-Peter Diettrich
DrDiettrich1 at aol.com
Fri Mar 9 11:28:44 CET 2012
Martin schrieb:
> When C2 gets the opREmove, it must mot just remove it's own entry, but
> also remove the entry C1 has
The meaning of opRemove is unclear. IMO it doesn't make sense in the
example code, because the owner of a component can change many times,
without meaning that the component is being destroyed. In such a
scenario the receiver can not know whether (when) the notification
should be removed, the notification itself is quite useless.
>>>> Owner.RemoveComponent(C1); // C2 Gets on opRemove
DoDi
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list