[fpc-devel] But what /is/ a string?

Anton Kavalenka anton.k at tut.by
Mon Aug 27 11:37:10 CEST 2012

On 27.08.2012 11:51, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 03:14 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>> Would there be any advantage in reimplementing strings as a tree of 
>> classes,
> If in future TObject is reference (as it might be in a future Delphi 
> version, according to an Embarcadero blog) counting (and thus using 
> .Free is not mandatory any more), it seems very appropriate to have 
> String be a sibling of TObject.
> -Michael
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Fully agree with you!

Automatic reference counted object with set of overloaded methods and 
operators suitable for any legacy string types.

Vote for this!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20120827/4af87722/attachment.html>

More information about the fpc-devel mailing list