<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 27.08.2012 11:51, Michael Schnell wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:503B34FF.3060404@lumino.de" type="cite">On
08/24/2012 03:14 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<br>
Would there be any advantage in reimplementing strings as a tree
of classes,
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
If in future TObject is reference (as it might be in a future
Delphi version, according to an Embarcadero blog) counting (and
thus using .Free is not mandatory any more), it seems very
appropriate to have String be a sibling of TObject.
<br>
<br>
-Michael
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
fpc-devel maillist - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org">fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel">http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Liberation Sans">Fully agree with you!<br>
<br>
Automatic reference counted object with set of overloaded methods
and operators suitable for any legacy string types.<br>
<br>
Vote for this!<br>
<br>
<br>
regards,<br>
Anton<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>