[fpc-devel] Troubles with FPDOC in 2.5.1 and 2.4.1
nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
Fri May 14 17:13:54 CEST 2010
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:08:41 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org> wrote:
> > Probably because the former parser only parsed the interface.
> > Maybe fpdoc now tries to parse the implementation too? That's not
> > needed, is it?
> It should stop at the implementation keyword ?
I think implementation needs good comments. The local types and
variables don't need fpdoc docs, do they?
If someone wants to use fpdoc for implementation, maybe it should
be made optional?
More information about the fpc-devel