[fpc-devel] Troubles with FPDOC in 2.5.1 and 2.4.1
Michael Van Canneyt
michael at freepascal.org
Fri May 14 17:08:41 CEST 2010
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010 16:52:30 +0200
> Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 14 May 2010 16:41, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>> I can send you my 49 smaller patches. But I doubt that would help.
>> Personally, I would have preferred that because it's easier to debug a
>> problem afterwards when things doesn't work. You have smaller commits
>> to work through. Having a 150K patch means I (and probably others that
>> didn't work on that patch) have no clue where to start looking for the
> Well, I doubt that the patches would help here. I rewrote some parts
> multiple times.
>>> AFAIK deprecated and label were not supported, so I did not break
>> The tiOPF code I tried to document with fpdoc did NOT fail with the
>> 'label' or 'xxx of byte' syntax. Only after your commit did the errors
>> of that syntax appear.
> Probably because the former parser only parsed the interface.
> Maybe fpdoc now tries to parse the implementation too? That's not
> needed, is it?
It should stop at the implementation keyword ?
More information about the fpc-devel