[fpc-devel] is that intended? private type section in classes versus visibility

Paul Ishenin ip at kmiac.ru
Fri Jul 23 03:20:31 CEST 2010

23.07.2010 9:10, Martin пишет:
> Since it now is possible to define types inside a class,
> please look at the example below.

Now = only in fpc trunk, not in the release branch.

> Is that intended? Or should a visibility change exit the type section?

This is a bug. I will fix it.

Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.

More information about the fpc-devel mailing list