[fpc-devel] is that intended? private type section in classes versus visibility
lazarus at mfriebe.de
Fri Jul 23 03:10:28 CEST 2010
Since it now is possible to define types inside a class,
please look at the example below.
the class internal type section continues accross the border of the
visibility "protected" => an error is given that after the "f" a "=" was
expected (as needed for a new type "f")
Is that intended? Or should a visibility change exit the type section?
TF = (one,two,three);
// var // enable this and it works
More information about the fpc-devel