[fpc-devel] class abstract, class sealed implementation. please review.

[Alexander Klenin]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 20:27, Paul Ishenin <ip at kmiac.ru> wrote:
> Alexander Klenin wrote:
>
>> This is not the question of terminology (though I think the proper
>> term in this case is "non-reserved keyword"), but of the fact that
>> some programs that compiled previously will stop compiling after that
>> patch.
>
>
> I don't believe there are programs which have classes with Sealed/Abstract
> fields in the published sections without actually declaring "published".
>
> Even if some exists there will be no mach.

Of course. Still, Jonas is right, this should be mentioned in wiki.

-- 
Alexander S. Klenin