cpstrnew branch (was Re: [fpc-devel] Freepascal 2.4.0rc1 released)
fpmse at bluewin.ch
Wed Nov 11 13:33:33 CET 2009
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:08:45 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 18:33:54 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >>> Did you look into the code in cpstrnew branch? I did.
> >> And which changes are exactly the reason for your concerns?
> > More checks
> Where? A pure unicodestring routine won't get additional checks.
> > and more complicated address calculation.
> Where? Adding 16 instead of 12 makes no difference.
> The "major" difference will be the initialization of the additional
> fields and the increased memory requirement of 4 bytes per string.
I try to prove the exciting statement. How can I build a startup compiler for
the cpstrnew branch or how to compile the cpstrnew branch?
More information about the fpc-devel